Evaluation of Performance Characteristics of the StandardTM Q IgM/IgG and the Wantai SARS-CoV-2 Ab Rapid Tests in Tanzania

Main Article Content

Lwitiho Sudi
George P. Judicate
Abisai Kisinda
Stephen Msangi
Marco Misanga
Regino Mgaya
Nyanda Ntinginya
Lucas Maganga
Wiston William
Mkunde Chachage
Thomas F. Marandu
Bernard Ngowi
Mbazi Senkoro
Muhammad Bakari
Philemon Wambura
Said Aboud
Sayoki Godfrey Mfinanga

Abstract

Background: Rapid diagnostic tests (RDTs) have played a critical role in the detection and monitoring of severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) infections globally. A number of RDTs are currently available, and their accuracy is dependent on several factors that include disease stage, circulating virus variants at the particular time, and the population being tested. This study aimed to evaluate the performance characteristics of two RDTs, the StandardTM Q IgM/IgG and the Wantai SARS-CoV-2 Ab Rapid Test, for the detection of SARS-CoV-2 antibodies in a Tanzanian population.
Methods: Plasma samples from a total of 80 individuals stored at the National Institute for Medical Research-Mbeya Medical Research Centre (NIMR-MMRC) biobank were tested. Of these, 37 (46.3%) were confirmed to have been exposed to the SARS-CoV-2 virus through either RT-PCR or Ag rapid tests from ongoing COVID-19 studies. The remaining 43 (53.6%) serving as negative controls, were stored samples from SARS-CoV-2 unexposed individuals obtained from an HIV cohort enrolled between 2014 and 2017. All the samples were tested using both the StandardTM Q IgM/IgG and the Wantai SARS-CoV-2 Ab Rapid Test. The sensitivity, specificity, and other performance characteristics of each test were determined.
Results: The StandardTM Q IgM/IgG test demonstrated a higher sensitivity of 100% (95% CI: 74–100%) for patients with acute COVID-19 (less than ten days since onset of symptoms). The Wantai SARS-CoV-2 Ab rapid test had a sensitivity of 75% (95% CI: 43–95%). Both tests revealed a specificity of 100% (95% CI: 74–100%). For patients with more than 30 days since the onset of symptoms, the StandardTM Q IgM/IgG test showed a sensitivity of 96% (95% CI: 80-100%), while the Wantai total Ab assay had a sensitivity of 92% (95% CI: 74-99%), and again both test kits revealed a specificity of 100% (95% CI: 74-100%).
Conclusion: The StandardTM Q IgM/IgG Rapid Diagnostic Test is recommended to be used as the primary test for COVID-19 survey screening purposes due to its higher sensitivity, while the Wantai total Ab RDT is recommended to be regarded as the second option.

Article Details

Section
Original Articles